<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When brand protection goes terribly wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/when-brand-protection-goes-terribly-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/when-brand-protection-goes-terribly-wrong/</link>
	<description>A Top 20 ranked Australian marketing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:20:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talking Football</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/when-brand-protection-goes-terribly-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-3094</link>
		<dc:creator>Talking Football</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=606#comment-3094</guid>
		<description>Really nice article.  I especially like your comments.

&quot;the AFL’s attitude towards consumer generated media represents a massive missed opportunity. Few brands can engender the type of passion and interest that the AFL generates from its customers. Indeed, marketers across the globe are busily devising strategies to get their customer’s talking about their brand online.&quot;

We are living in a every changing world ,I think the AFL will get it. However, like anything the corporate giant will just take time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really nice article.  I especially like your comments.</p>
<p>&#8220;the AFL’s attitude towards consumer generated media represents a massive missed opportunity. Few brands can engender the type of passion and interest that the AFL generates from its customers. Indeed, marketers across the globe are busily devising strategies to get their customer’s talking about their brand online.&#8221;</p>
<p>We are living in a every changing world ,I think the AFL will get it. However, like anything the corporate giant will just take time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inspiredworlds</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/when-brand-protection-goes-terribly-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>inspiredworlds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 03:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=606#comment-2213</guid>
		<description>just read the contested footy blog post. that&#039;s a stupid move by the AFL. they should be encouraging these type of blogs and engaging the online communities. 

even though I&#039;m not a fan of AFL, you want diehard fans to be spreading the love of the game. 

someone hand the AFL a marketing 101 textbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just read the contested footy blog post. that&#8217;s a stupid move by the AFL. they should be encouraging these type of blogs and engaging the online communities. </p>
<p>even though I&#8217;m not a fan of AFL, you want diehard fans to be spreading the love of the game. </p>
<p>someone hand the AFL a marketing 101 textbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Duthie</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/when-brand-protection-goes-terribly-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-2212</link>
		<dc:creator>James Duthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 07:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=606#comment-2212</guid>
		<description>My pleasure fellas. Always happy to stick up for the little guy! The AFL has been unnecessarily heavy handed and completely unreasonable. They should see this sort of activity as a opportunity rather than a threat. As you guys have said in previous interviews, you&#039;re actually help them promote the brand... God knows what they&#039;d do to people who really do damage the brand (perhaps we should ask Grant Thomas).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pleasure fellas. Always happy to stick up for the little guy! The AFL has been unnecessarily heavy handed and completely unreasonable. They should see this sort of activity as a opportunity rather than a threat. As you guys have said in previous interviews, you&#8217;re actually help them promote the brand&#8230; God knows what they&#8217;d do to people who really do damage the brand (perhaps we should ask Grant Thomas).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Wieselmann</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/when-brand-protection-goes-terribly-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Wieselmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=606#comment-2209</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the support. This is the best summary blog post i think i have seen. Great work.

AFL need to realise the value of crowd sourcing and should review their copyright protection strategy, in my opinion, to reflect the new social media trends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the support. This is the best summary blog post i think i have seen. Great work.</p>
<p>AFL need to realise the value of crowd sourcing and should review their copyright protection strategy, in my opinion, to reflect the new social media trends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Rose</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/when-brand-protection-goes-terribly-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-2208</link>
		<dc:creator>James Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=606#comment-2208</guid>
		<description>Like the article.

We are yet to make even $20 from adsense. At that stage we were down $50.

The 1000 visitors a day was after the papers picked up the story. When being interviewed I meant 1000 visitors a week. We&#039;d get about 200 visitors a day at the moment with about 600 pageviews.

Cheers for your article and the link.

James.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the article.</p>
<p>We are yet to make even $20 from adsense. At that stage we were down $50.</p>
<p>The 1000 visitors a day was after the papers picked up the story. When being interviewed I meant 1000 visitors a week. We&#8217;d get about 200 visitors a day at the moment with about 600 pageviews.</p>
<p>Cheers for your article and the link.</p>
<p>James.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by uglybustards</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/when-brand-protection-goes-terribly-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-2207</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by uglybustards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=606#comment-2207</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by uglybustards - Real-url.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by uglybustards &#8211; Real-url.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.904 seconds -->

