Comments on: Snark + Narcissism = The Snarcissist http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/snark-narcissism-the-snarcissist/ A Top 20 ranked Australian marketing blog Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:02:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1 By: James Duthie http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/snark-narcissism-the-snarcissist/comment-page-1/#comment-3111 Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:02:39 +0000 http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=1294#comment-3111 What do you expect from League supporters Oyst? I’m actually surprised they can write… There’s plenty of snarcissists on the Essendon Footy club’s web site as well. Sport attracts the best and worst types of people. There’s probably a 50/50 split on most sports blogs I read.

]]>
By: Daniel Oyston http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/snark-narcissism-the-snarcissist/comment-page-1/#comment-3104 Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:33:32 +0000 http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=1294#comment-3104 sorry, I meant Telegraph … I must sound like the dog of the Jetsons!

]]>
By: Daniel Oyston http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/snark-narcissism-the-snarcissist/comment-page-1/#comment-3103 Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:32:38 +0000 http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=1294#comment-3103 Plenty of them on The Daily Relegraph on Phil Rothfields League Blog! It’s like bears to honey!

Best thing is, Phil just hangs shit on most fo them if they leave snarcissistic (is that teh right term?) comments.

Snarcissist’s are the evidence that opinions are like assholes … everyone has one. Thing is, not everyone has something worth saying (but not a lot you can do about that unless you want to moderate comments).

]]>
By: Maik http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/snark-narcissism-the-snarcissist/comment-page-1/#comment-3102 Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:19:00 +0000 http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=1294#comment-3102 As much as I love mumbrella these guys are turning it into a nasty atmosphere, with nothing good to say most of the time. And they never prove their brilliance by providing an alternative strategy or execution.

]]>
By: Pablo Edwards http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/snark-narcissism-the-snarcissist/comment-page-1/#comment-3100 Sun, 27 Jun 2010 14:57:14 +0000 http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=1294#comment-3100 Great new term, I really appreciate the write up surrounding it, too. It sounds like I know a few snarcissists.

]]>
By: Geoff http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/snark-narcissism-the-snarcissist/comment-page-1/#comment-3097 Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:17:45 +0000 http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=1294#comment-3097 You’re right chage challenging them to submit their own ideas and suggestions. Far easier to tear down someone else’s ideas than actually come with your own.

]]>
By: James Duthie http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/snark-narcissism-the-snarcissist/comment-page-1/#comment-3090 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 03:14:00 +0000 http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=1294#comment-3090 @Matt – No doubt the snark factor can be entertaining and amusing at times. But when it becomes a predominant sentiment, it annoys me.

@Connor – Indeed. I’ve certainly seen snarcissistic behaviour at Digg, and likewise YouTube can be one of the most poisonous environments on the web. Wherever you find a large crowd forming on the web, you’ll find snarcissists.

]]>
By: Connor http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/snark-narcissism-the-snarcissist/comment-page-1/#comment-3089 Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:45:36 +0000 http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=1294#comment-3089 If you want to see where snarcissists are actually born & bred…head on over to Digg.

]]>
By: inspiredworlds http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/snark-narcissism-the-snarcissist/comment-page-1/#comment-3088 Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:14:24 +0000 http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=1294#comment-3088 techcrunch is similar, but i love it! you get a lot of smart ass comments and even the writers join it, and occassionally some heavyweights in the industry leave comments. really cool, i guess there’s a mixture of snark + insight + banter.

]]>
By: James Duthie http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/snark-narcissism-the-snarcissist/comment-page-1/#comment-3083 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:08:44 +0000 http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=1294#comment-3083 Yup. The anonymity is the killer. Pretty weak really considering the sniper approach that they apply. It’s a shame because Mumbrella was one of my fav sites when it first launched. It still produces relatively good content, but the trolls have detracted from credibility of the site for me.

]]>