<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter killing the inbound link?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/is-twitter-killing-the-inbound-link/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/is-twitter-killing-the-inbound-link/</link>
	<description>A Top 20 ranked Australian marketing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:37:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shout SEO</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/is-twitter-killing-the-inbound-link/comment-page-1/#comment-2608</link>
		<dc:creator>Shout SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 01:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=869#comment-2608</guid>
		<description>This is a good topic. Not all inbound links are of the same value. Google likes to see links from lots of different types of domain names, so the links appear to have been build naturally. A heavy number of social media links often represents that your content is good enough to be tagged on social media sites. However, these links are not strong in the sense they are linking from low, or no page rank, pages. So while they are good to have such domains pointing to you, Google does not see twitter links as powerful one way links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good topic. Not all inbound links are of the same value. Google likes to see links from lots of different types of domain names, so the links appear to have been build naturally. A heavy number of social media links often represents that your content is good enough to be tagged on social media sites. However, these links are not strong in the sense they are linking from low, or no page rank, pages. So while they are good to have such domains pointing to you, Google does not see twitter links as powerful one way links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web design Brisbane</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/is-twitter-killing-the-inbound-link/comment-page-1/#comment-2596</link>
		<dc:creator>Web design Brisbane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=869#comment-2596</guid>
		<description>Google may ignore links from Twitter Tweats, but I&#039;m pretty sure it doesn&#039;t ignore links from your Twitter profile. I&#039;ve only been on Twitter a month or so, but my profile page has a PR2.

Check out Matt Cutt&#039;s profile http://twitter.com/mattcutts

PR6 and it&#039;s a dofollow link :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google may ignore links from Twitter Tweats, but I&#8217;m pretty sure it doesn&#8217;t ignore links from your Twitter profile. I&#8217;ve only been on Twitter a month or so, but my profile page has a PR2.</p>
<p>Check out Matt Cutt&#8217;s profile <a href="http://twitter.com/mattcutts" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/mattcutts</a></p>
<p>PR6 and it&#8217;s a dofollow link <img src='http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Herbert</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/is-twitter-killing-the-inbound-link/comment-page-1/#comment-2571</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketingbanter.com/?p=869#comment-2571</guid>
		<description>While it’s true that twitter is a more convenient medium for linking, it does create a problem in that links on twitter, or any social network for that matter, tend to be a lot less permanent than links on static web pages. This has the effect of making throes links worth less than static links (not only are people not going to see them in an hour’s time, but they tend to be rel=nofollow links as well)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it’s true that twitter is a more convenient medium for linking, it does create a problem in that links on twitter, or any social network for that matter, tend to be a lot less permanent than links on static web pages. This has the effect of making throes links worth less than static links (not only are people not going to see them in an hour’s time, but they tend to be rel=nofollow links as well)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.569 seconds -->

